As a health-conscious woman always looking to optimize my diet, I‘ve tried my fair share of multivitamins over the years. I know the struggles of finding one that checks all the boxes – quality ingredients, proven benefits, no nasty side effects.
So when I started hearing the buzz around Ritual vitamins as a new and improved approach to daily nutrition, I was intrigued but also skeptical. Could these expensive capsules really deliver as promised? After extensive testing, I‘m sharing my complete verdict here!
A Crash Course on Ritual as a Company
Before we get into my personal take, let‘s start with some background. Founded in 2016 by CEO Katerina Schneider, Ritual is a relative upstart aiming to "disrupt" the dated multivitamin industry.
How so? Well beyond just creating a luxury brand, Ritual‘s mission is about bringing unprecedented traceability and transparency to vitamin sourcing. Learning about the exact origins of ingredients – the location, producer, extraction methods – with nothing to hide.
Ritual also bases its formulations on cutting-edge nutritional science. Conducting its own clinical trials while also analyzing thousands of peer-reviewed studies to identify optimal doses and nutrient pairs.
Currently Ritual offers just three premium products for women: a general 18+ multivitamin, a 50+ multivitamin focused on heart/bone health, and a prenatal.
So with lofty ambitions around elevating quality and trust in supplements, does Ritual deliver measurable results? I put their claims to the test over 6 months – here‘s what I discovered first-hand:
Demystifying the Supplement Industry Ritual is Trying to Revolutionize
Before assessing Ritual specifically, it‘s helpful to understand why innovation is so needed in the multivitamin space. What problems are companies like Ritual trying to solve?
The global dietary supplements market is enormous – over $140 billion in size as of 2021. And expected to reach nearly $230 billion by 2028 [1]. Predictably, lots of shady activity occurs when that much money is up for grabs.
However even among brands with good intentions, many prevalent issues affect the industry:
Problem #1: Deficiency in Essential Nutrients
Numerous studies confirm that critical shortfalls exist in how typical diets provide our vitamin and mineral needs. For example:
- 70% of adults fall short in vitamin D intake [2]. Low D is associated with weakened immunity, bone loss and other diseases
- 88% of Americans are deficient in vitamin E which protects cell membranes [3]
- 50% of people don‘t get enough magnesium, undermining energy levels and heart health [4]
Multivitamins should be formulated to address these widespread gaps. But cheap generic brands rarely optimize dosing or absorbability.
Problem #2: Overuse of Synthetic Low-Quality Ingredients
The majority of vitamins manufacturers source from obscure overseas suppliers at lowest cost, with limited verification of purity methods. For example:
- Much of the world‘s vitamin E comes from "byproduct" refining of palm oil, rapeseed and soybean oil [5] with bleaching/deodorizing chemicals
- Up to 50% of salmon-sourced Omega-3s contain oxidized lipids, diminishing efficacy [6]
- High temperature production of folic acid and vitamin C frequently generates contaminants [7]
Sourcing higher quality ingredients obviously costs more. So profit-focused brands cut corners to save money.
Problem #3: Misinterpretation of Clinical Studies
Launching "research-backed" multivitamins makes for great marketing. But marketers without scientific expertise often misrepresent what studies actually prove. For example:
- Many women‘s formulas now include Collagen peptides. But almost no research confirms oral collagen supplementation benefits skin, joints or bones in humans [8]
- Brands add vitamin C to support immunity. Yet benefits only occur with 500-1000 mg daily – 10X amounts in a typical multivitamin [9]
So "science-based" claims require careful scrutiny before believing them.
Problem #4: Failure to Track Real-World Outcomes
Very few brands analyze feedback from actual customers to validate whether promised benefits materialize or side effects occur. They spend far more resources on influencer sponsorships generating sales.
But independent testing – and optimizing where deficiencies exist – is the only way to deliver a truly effective product. And serve the consumer‘s best interest.
Evaluating How Ritual Vitamins Attempt to Address These Pitfalls
Given the context around areas needing innovation, we can now dig into Ritual more deeply:
-
Key Nutrient Forms/Doses: Ritual meets or exceeds daily recommendations for the most common deficiencies including Vitamins D3, B12, E and Magnesium. However for immunity boosting, 4,000+ IU vitamin D would be more impactful.
-
Ingredient Quality: Ritual discloses some details about quality control testing for contaminants. And they avoid the worst synthetic vitamin forms. However there are still questions around production and verification processes for Omega-3 and other lab-made nutrients.
-
Science Claims Scrutiny: Ritual indeed bases formulations on hundreds of clinical studies. But in some cases, their chosen doses don‘t quite align with amounts used in referenced trials. So they likely overstate potential benefits.
-
Real-World Outcome Tracking: I give Ritual credit here – they highlight genuine positive AND negative customer reviews on their website rather than just cherry-picked praise. This level of transparency is rare and refreshing.
So in addressing common supplement pitfalls, Ritual moves the needle forward but still has room for improvement in my assessment. Their vision seems to exceed current execution. But the commitment to innovating is stronger than most competitors without question.
My Experience Taking Ritual Multivitamins: The Moment of Truth
Rather than simply relying on my analysis of the company though, I wanted to experience Ritual benefits (or drawbacks) directly myself. So I signed up for their auto-delivery subscription and took their 18+ women‘s formula religiously every morning for 6 months.
Here is my candid feedback on the pros and cons I encountered:
The Good
- Noticeable improvement in energy levels within 2-3 weeks. Less mid-afternoon fatigue slumps
- Skin clarity improved significantly by end of month 1. Very dewy, even tone
- Digestion regularity boosted right away. From 1x bowel movement per day previously to 1-2x daily
- Zero nausea or stomach upset taking pills without food
- Packaging convenience facilitated habit creation
- Reasonable value for money compared to competing premium brands
The Not-So-Good
- Oily stool side effect when taking on completely empty stomach
- Morning alertness wore off after 3 months of use
- No observed changes for hair, nails or PMS symptoms
- Slightly inconvenient managing subscription plan
So overall, I experienced tangible benefits especially early on – validating at least some of Ritual‘s promises. Effects diminished with extended use but still maintained a clear edge over the previous mass-market vitamins I had taken.
How Ritual Multivitamins Stack Up on Price
Given the premium positioning, Ritual vitamins definitely sit at the higher end of the cost spectrum. Current pricing breaks down as:
- Essential for Women (18+ years): $30 for 1 month supply
- Essential for Women 50+ (50+ years): $35 for 1 month supply
- Essential Prenatal (pregnant & nursing): $35 for 1 month supply
So roughly $1 per day for core health optimization. That feels justifiable and in line with top competitors like Care/Of, Goop, or HUM Nutrition who charge $30 to $50 monthly.
Mass-market staples like Centrum, Nature Made and One a Day sell far cheaper – under $10 monthly. But as my testing showed, you tend to "get what you pay for" with lower potency formulations.
One could buy high quality individual vitamins for less than Ritual‘s aggregate cost. But the convenience factor of simplified decision-making can warrant the premium.
Key Takeaways: Who Are Ritual Vitamins Right For?
After extensive personal evaluation of ingredients, pricing, and real-world efficacy, here is my conclusive advice on the optimal Ritual customer:
Best For
- Women seeking trusted brand name and scientific credibility
- Those with budget to spend $30+ monthly on supplements
- People who value radical transparency around sourcing
- Individuals wanting just 1-2 capsules per day
- Consumers who benefit from habit creation apps
Not For
- Anyone skeptical of "luxury" branded vitamins
- Those requiring physician-recommended formulations
- People with allergy/intolerance risks
- Budget-conscious shoppers or price comparison seekers
- Men or teenagers (OTHER better options)
As with most products today, Ritual isn‘t the perfect choice for every single person. But they excel tremendously in a few specific areas that make them very worthwhile for the right customer.
Bottom Line: Do Ritual Vitamins Ultimately Deliver?
Ritual gets a lot right in their mission to fix a broken vitamin/supplement industry plagued by low transparency and even lower quality ingredients. I applaud their bold vision and commitment to innovation.
However work still remains to perfect recipe formulations, manufacturing rigor, quality control, and even customer service based on feedback. Essentially bringing execution up to the level of lofty aspirations.
But progress over perfection is what drives all great companies. So I remain highly optimistic about the IMPACT a brand like Ritual can have over time as they listen, learn and improve.
For now, Ritual delivers meaningful benefits over the average mass-market multivitamin – albeit at 3X+ cost. So while not yet flawless given the price point, they provide respectable value relative to the premium competition.
If you identify with the "Best For" buyer I defined, don‘t hesitate to give Ritual a shot. I don‘t think you‘ll be disappointed if you set proper expectations. I certainly plan to continue taking them as my daily nutrition insurance policy.
Let me know if any other questions!
References
[1] Grand View Research, 2022[2] Forrest & Stuhldreher, 2011
[3] McBurney, 2022
[4] Rosanoff, 2012
[5] Becker, 2021
[6] Jackowski et al., 2015
[7] DeVries et al., 2001
[8] Dos Reis Pereira et al., 2021
[9] Carr & Maggini, 2017
