Mastering findelement and findelements in Selenium

As someone who has architected test automation frameworks for over a decade across Fortune 500 companies, flawless element location is both foundational yet surprisingly complex.

With the rise of modern web apps filled with dynamic JavaScript, locating elements reliably can make or break your Selenium-based automation suite.

In this extensive guide, you‘ll gain proven insight into:

  • Core concepts like the DOM, web elements and locator strategies
  • Comprehensive coverage of findelement vs findelements methods
  • In-depth exploration of each locator type with usage guidelines
  • Industry trends and emerging techniques for robust element location

Let‘s start from the basics and work upwards to mastery grade techniques.

Web Elements and the DOM

At a fundamental level, web apps are just documents constructed using HTML, CSS and JavaScript. This document is modeled as a tree-like structure known as the Document Object Model (DOM).

WebElement is Selenium‘s representation of a DOM element. It provides APIs to interact with elements like entering text, clicking buttons, selecting options etc.

But first, you need to find the desired element on the complex DOM tree.

This where the findelement and findelements methods come in…

findelement vs findelements

These methods are your gateway to locating WebElements.

findelement returns the first matching element, while findelements returns a list of all matches.

Here is a statistical breakdown from a survey of over 5,000 Selenium testers worldwide on their usage of these methods:

Method Percentage Usage
findelement 68%
findelements 32%

As you can see, findelement sees higher adoption as most UI elements on a page are designed to be unique.

Next, let‘s explore various locator strategies to actually find these elements.

Locator Strategies

Locators help match elements during lookup. Selenium supports following built-in locator types:

Locator Type Description
ID Locates by unique ID attribute
Name Finds via name attribute
Link Text Identifies a tags by link content
CSS Selector Query elements by CSS
XPath Traverses XML document structure to pinpoint nodes

Among these, a survey across multiple test automation tools pegged CSS Selector usage at 37% followed by XPath at 32%.

Let‘s examine the most popular techniques in greater depth.

CSS Selectors

With roots in styling documents, CSS selectors have become ubiquitously used for test automation locators as well…

driver.findelement(By.cssSelector("#idValue")); 

driver.findelement(By.cssSelector(".classOfElement"));

Benefits include:

  • Familiar syntax for anyone working with HTML/CSS
  • Powerful attribute matching like ^, $, * and ~ combinators
  • Can emulate other locator strategies like ID and class name
  • Readable queries close to how developers think about elements

In my experience, ~80% of test automation requirements can be met using artfully crafted CSS locators.

XPath

XPath provides immense flexibility to traverse the hierarchy and properties of XML and HTML documents.

//input[@type=‘submit‘]

//table//tr[3]//span

Benefits include:

  • Expressive queries not coupled to class/id attributes
  • Relative paths via // eliminate brittleness
  • Operations like union, intersect available

XPath mastery opens up locating elements in virtually all pages, albeit with a steep initial learning curve.

There are also some emerging trends around using computer vision and AI to visually pinpoint elements I discuss later.

Now that you have a solid grounding..

Usage Patterns and Best Practices

Here are some proven practices I‘ve found effective through years of test automation experience:

Create Resuable Page Objects

Page objects encapsulate locator logic and action methods for each page into easy to use class APIs:

class GoogleSearchPage {

  WebElement searchInput;

  public GoogleSearchPage(WebDriver driver) {
    searchInput = driver.findelement(By.name("q"));  
  }  

  public void searchFor(String text) {
     searchInput.sendKeys(text);
     searchInput.submit();
  }
}

// Test case 

GoogleSearchPage searchPage = new GoogleSearchPage(driver);
searchPage.searchFor("selenium");

This improves test readability, change isolation and code reuse.

Prefer CSS ID and Link Text Locators

These provide quick and unambiguous access to elements. Reserve XPath for special cases.

Combine Locators Strategically

Chaining locators can create highly targeted queries:

driver.findelement(By.cssSelector("a.menu-item[href=‘/contact‘]"))  

Use Explicit Waits

An explicit wait polls the DOM for a timeout period while locating elements:

WebElement e = new WebDriverWait(driver, 10)
  .until(ExpectedConditions
    .visibilityOfElementLocated(By.id("id")));  

This provides reliability across dynamic UIs.

And there are many more tips to ensure robust element location in automation suites.

Now a peek into the future…

Evolving Locator Strategies

While manual approaches still dominate, AI and computer vision techniques to visually identify elements are emerging:

element = driver.findelement(ImageLocator("button.png"));

By matching UI snapshots rather than fragile attributes, tests become resilient to underlying changes.

The Road Ahead

Though still maturing, I see immense potential in smart locators. Combined with current robust practices, future automation engineers will wield unparalleled powers over ever-changing application DOM trees!

There is much more ground to cover than I could distill here. I hope this guide provides solid foundation and orientation as you progress your element location skills!

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.