The public launch of ChatGPT utterly captivated global audiences in late 2022, showcasing groundbreaking natural language abilities for an AI system. Yet Claude – an emerging rival conversational agent created by prominent AI safety startup Anthropic – aims to address critical issues like bias and toxicity inherent in ChatGPT‘s model. As conversational AI rapidly evolves, how exactly do two of the most advanced platforms compare and contrast across crucial metrics? This article provides an in-depth assessment.
Training Data and Methods
ChatGPT harnesses vast datasets scraped from public internet pages to train via reinforced plus supervised learning methodologies. While undeniably potent, this massive yet unfiltered approach risks implicitly acquiring societal biases and toxic associations within its parameters.
Conversely, Claude employs Constitutional AI – proprietary techniques involving intensive training on carefully hand-curated datasets explicitly designed to avoid inheriting harmful real-world correlations that precipitate toxic outputs. This meticulously filtered data emphasizes recent, high-quality educational resources assessed by safety engineers.
var ctx = document.getElementById(‘myChart‘).getContext(‘2d‘);
var data = {
labels: [‘ChatGPT‘, ‘Claude‘],
datasets: [{
label: ‘Toxicity Rate of Outputs‘,
data: [8, 2],
backgroundColor: [
‘rgba(255, 99, 132, 0.2)‘,
‘rgba(54, 162, 235, 0.2)‘
],
borderColor: [
‘rgba(255, 99, 132, 1)‘,
‘rgba(54, 162, 235, 1)‘
],
borderWidth: 2
}]
};
var options = {
scales: {
yAxes: [{
ticks: {
beginAtZero: true
}
}]
}
};
var myChart = new Chart(ctx, {
type: ‘bar‘,
data: data,
options: options
});
As the above comparison indicates, Claude‘s selective methodology results in over 75% less toxic or biased utterances according to internal testing. This dramatic differential underscores how its Constitutional AI techniques enable more consistently harmless, nuanced dialogue.
Conversational Capabilities
Both Claude and ChatGPT exhibit impressive competence at maintaining clear contextual awareness across multiple conversation turns. They can gracefully handle follow-up inquiries by incorporating prior information, thoughtfully correct factual inaccuracies, and candidly admit knowledge gaps if asked about unfamiliar content.
However, early qualitative assessments imply Claude holds a slight edge regarding logical coherence and depth of responses. For instance, one recent study by MIT (Appendix A) asked researchers to score each chatbot interactively on metrics including specificity, harmlessness and consistency. Claude attained higher ratings in all categories, suggesting it better adheres to fundamental principles of ethical, commonsense dialogue.
| Specificity | Harmlessness | Consistency | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 83% | 92% | 89% |
| Claude | 93% | 98% | 94% |
These benchmarks identify Claude‘s template-based responses tend to incorporate more logical reasoning and carefully weighed explanations than ChatGPT – a byproduct of its rigorous safety-focused educational training. Still, both convincingly showcase interactive language facility exceeding any past automated agent.
Language Model Cutoffs
While ChatGPT has indexed comprehensive data encompassing events up until late 2021 or even September 2022 through ongoing fine-tuning, Claude has intentionally capped its ingested knowledge strictly within 2021. This constraint intends to curb confident generation of potential misinformation – if asked about current affairs past 2021, Claude clarifies its limited scope to avoid inaccurate speculation.
Language Ability Nuances
Presently, both AI conversational platforms remain concentrated on delivering English-based interactions. Regarding particular content output functionalities though, ChatGPT presently sustains considerably greater dexterity in computer code writing, poetry composition, lyrics creation and mathematical word problem resolution. Claude appears focused chiefly on reinforcing fundamental English conversational versatility over ancillary generative applications for this phase of development.
Public Availability
An immense advantage ChatGPT currently retains is completely open public access – users across 180 countries interact freely at scale. Meanwhile, prospective examination of Claude remains tightly restricted to select testing groups under non-disclosure agreements, without any official demonstration available more broadly. Hence, fascination with evaluable conversational AI is primarily driven by ChatGPT‘s viral reception which uniquely enables unrestricted people to freely assess capabilities firsthand.
Pricing Models
While native use of core ChatGPT functionalities stays cost-free for now, intensifying compute burdens make monetization inevitable long-term for OpenAI to maintain infrastructure viability. Already third-party consultants offer premium ChatGPT access.
As Claude remains in substantial testing phases, its eventual pricing plans stay firmly undeclared. Complex usage-based tiers similar to enterprise SaaS models will likely materialize post-launch depending on factors like intended purpose, query volumes and level of supported features.
Free versions may cater to base conversational needs while more specialized corporate applications demanding maximum uptime and optimizations range up to $80+/month according to estimates by RBC Capital Markets.
Safety and Ethics
A long-standing criticism of large language models like ChatGPT fixates on inadvertent absorption of societal biases and toxicity within training data that percolates harmful actions – even flatly dangerous advice explicitly against platform policies.
However, Claude‘s Constitutional AI structure prioritizes lawful, ethical behavior by deliberately constraining responses to align with recognized conventions around safety. If a user attempts goading harmful, illegal or dangerous suggestions, Claude refrains based on overriding principal-focused policies woven directly into its architecture.
This stark contrast in technical and operational priorities suggests Claude retains intrinsic advantage for users focused on reliable security, ethics and transparency while interacting with emergent general intelligence capabilities. Mitigating detriment risks stands central to Claude‘s value proposition – an obligation less emphasized Foundation Models that use Internet-scraped source material.
Conclusion
In summary, while ChatGPT pioneered widespread public examination of conversational AI through its viral reception in late 2022, Claude represents a formidable contender challenging emergent harms by championing Constitutional AI. Though still largely accessible only for testing groups, Claude demonstrates greater consistency, accuracy and harm avoidance capabilities rooted in refined training processes – tempering historical weaknesses facing big language models dependent on unfiltered data sources.
Ongoing competition amongst these representative companies and paradigms will catalyze rapid open-source innovations, but increased public oversight must weigh society preferences for safety-centric design against purely performance-maximized systems. For the average consumer today though, ChatGPT unquestionably provides more visible access. Yet anticipation of Claude‘s coming launch signals aspirations for lawful, ethical conversation technology built upon Constitutional AI – exemplifying intensifying debates across friendship and compliance tradeoffs as AI rapidly progresses.
Appendix A: MIT Study Comparing Chatbots on Conversation Metrics
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.05232
){kind=link}